Reference Guide

This guide presents information on the Avocado basic design and its internals.

Job, test and identifiers

Job ID

The Job ID is a random SHA1 string that uniquely identifies a given job.

The full form of the SHA1 string is used is most references to a job:

$ avocado run
JOB ID     : 49ec339a6cca73397be21866453985f88713ac34

But a shorter version is also used at some places, such as in the job results location:

JOB LOG    : $HOME/avocado/job-results/job-2015-06-10T10.44-49ec339/job.log

Test References

A Test Reference is a string that can be resolved into (interpreted as) one or more tests by the Avocado Test Resolver. A given resolver plugin is free to interpret a test reference, it is completely abstract to the other components of Avocado.


Mapping the Test References to tests can be affected by command-line switches like –external-runner, which completelly changes the meaning of the given strings.

Test Name

A test name is an arbitrarily long string that unambiguously points to the source of a single test. In other words the Avocado Test Resolver, as configured for a particular job, should return one and only one test as the interpretation of this name.

This name can be as specific as necessary to make it unique. Therefore it can contain an arbitrary number of variables, prefixes, suffixes, tags, etc. It all depends on user preferences, what is supported by Avocado via its Test Resolvers and the context of the job.

The output of the Test Resolver when resolving Test References should always be a list of unambiguous Test Names (for that particular job).

Notice that although the Test Name has to be unique, one test can be run more than once inside a job.

By definition, a Test Name is a Test Reference, but the reciprocal is not necessarily true, as the latter can represent more than one test.

Variant IDs

The varianter component creates different sets of variables (known as “variants”), to allow tests to be run individually in each of them.

A Variant ID is an arbitrary and abstract string created by the varianter plugin to identify each variant. It should be unique per variant inside a set. In other words, the varianter plugin generates a set of variants, identified by unique IDs.

A simpler implementation of the varianter uses serial integers as Variant IDs. A more sophisticated implementation could generate Variant IDs with more semantic, potentially representing their contents.

Test ID

A test ID is a string that uniquely identifies a test in the context of a job. When considering a single job, there are no two tests with the same ID.

A test ID should encapsulate the Test Name and the Variant ID, to allow direct identification of a test. In other words, by looking at the test ID it should be possible to identify:

  • What’s the test name
  • What’s the variant used to run this test (if any)

Test IDs don’t necessarily keep their uniqueness properties when considered outside of a particular job, but two identical jobs run in the exact same environment should generate a identical sets of Test IDs.



Examples of test-names:

'/bin/grep foobar /etc/passwd'

Test Types

Avocado at its simplest configuration can run two different types of tests [1]. You can mix and match those in a single job.


These are tests written in Python or BASH with the Avocado helpers that use the Avocado test API.

To be more precise, the Python file must contain a class derived from avocado.test.Test. This means that an executable written in Python is not always an instrumented test, but may work as a simple test.

The instrumented tests allows the writer finer control over the process including logging, test result status and other more sophisticated test APIs.

Test statuses PASS, WARN, START and SKIP are considered as successful builds. The ABORT, ERROR, FAIL, ALERT, RUNNING, NOSTATUS and INTERRUPTED are considered as failed ones.


Any executable in your box. The criteria for PASS/FAIL is the return code of the executable. If it returns 0, the test PASSes, if it returns anything else, it FAILs.

Test Statuses

Avocado sticks to the following definitions of test statuses:

  • `PASS`: The test passed, which means all conditions being tested have passed.
  • `FAIL`: The test failed, which means at least one condition being tested has failed. Ideally, it should mean a problem in the software being tested has been found.
  • `ERROR`: An error happened during the test execution. This can happen, for example, if there’s a bug in the test runner, in its libraries or if a resource breaks unexpectedly. Uncaught exceptions in the test code will also result in this status.
  • `SKIP`: The test runner decided a requested test should not be run. This can happen, for example, due to missing requirements in the test environment or when there’s a job timeout.

Libraries and APIs

The Avocado libraries and its APIs are a big part of what Avocado is.

But, to avoid having any issues you should understand what parts of the Avocado libraries are intended for test writers and their respective API stability promises.

Test APIs

At the most basic level there’s the Test APIs which you should use when writing tests in Python and planning to make use of any other utility library.

The Test APIs can be found in the avocado main module, and its most important member is the avocado.Test class. By conforming to the avocado.Test API, that is, by inheriting from it, you can use the full set of utility libraries.

The Test APIs are guaranteed to be stable across a single major version of Avocado. That means that a test written for a given version of Avocado should not break on later minor versions because of Test API changes.

Utility Libraries

There are also a large number of utility libraries that can be found under the avocado.utils namespace. These are very general in nature and can help you speed up your test development.

The utility libraries may receive incompatible changes across minor versions, but these will be done in a staged fashion. If a given change to an utility library can cause test breakage, it will first be documented and/or deprecated, and only on the next subsequent minor version it will actually be changed.

What this means is that upon updating to later minor versions of Avocado, you should look at the Avocado Release Notes for changes that may impact your tests.

Core (Application) Libraries

Finally, everything under avocado.core is part of the application’s infrastructure and should not be used by tests.

Extensions and Plugins can use the core libraries, but API stability is not guaranteed at any level.

Test Resolution

When you use the Avocado runner, frequently you’ll provide paths to files, that will be inspected, and acted upon depending on their contents. The diagram below shows how Avocado analyzes a file and decides what to do with it:


It’s important to note that the inspection mechanism is safe (that is, python classes and files are not actually loaded and executed on discovery and inspection stage). Due to the fact Avocado doesn’t actually load the code and classes, the introspection is simple and will not catch things like buggy test modules, missing imports and miscellaneous bugs in the code you want to list or run. We recommend only running tests from sources you trust, use of static checking and reviews in your test development process.

Due to the simple test inspection mechanism, avocado will not recognize test classes that inherit from a class derived from avocado.Test. Please refer to the Writing Avocado Tests documentation on how to use the tags functionality to mark derived classes as avocado test classes.

Results Specification

On a machine that executed tests, job results are available under [job-results]/job-[timestamp]-[short job ID], where logdir is the configured Avocado logs directory (see the data dir plugin), and the directory name includes a timestamp, such as job-2014-08-12T15.44-565e8de. A typical results directory structure can be seen below

├── id
├── jobdata
│   ├── args
│   ├── cmdline
│   ├── config
│   ├── multiplex
│   ├── pwd
│   └── test_references
├── job.log
├── results.json
├── results.xml
├── sysinfo
│   ├── post
│   │   ├── brctl_show
│   │   ├── cmdline
│   │   ├── cpuinfo
│   │   ├── current_clocksource
│   │   ├── df_-mP
│   │   ├── dmesg_-c
│   │   ├── dmidecode
│   │   ├── fdisk_-l
│   │   ├── gcc_--version
│   │   ├── hostname
│   │   ├── ifconfig_-a
│   │   ├── interrupts
│   │   ├── ip_link
│   │   ├── ld_--version
│   │   ├── lscpu
│   │   ├── lspci_-vvnn
│   │   ├── meminfo
│   │   ├── modules
│   │   ├── mount
│   │   ├── mounts
│   │   ├── numactl_--hardware_show
│   │   ├── partitions
│   │   ├── scaling_governor
│   │   ├── uname_-a
│   │   ├── uptime
│   │   └── version
│   ├── pre
│   │   ├── brctl_show
│   │   ├── cmdline
│   │   ├── cpuinfo
│   │   ├── current_clocksource
│   │   ├── df_-mP
│   │   ├── dmesg_-c
│   │   ├── dmidecode
│   │   ├── fdisk_-l
│   │   ├── gcc_--version
│   │   ├── hostname
│   │   ├── ifconfig_-a
│   │   ├── interrupts
│   │   ├── ip_link
│   │   ├── ld_--version
│   │   ├── lscpu
│   │   ├── lspci_-vvnn
│   │   ├── meminfo
│   │   ├── modules
│   │   ├── mount
│   │   ├── mounts
│   │   ├── numactl_--hardware_show
│   │   ├── partitions
│   │   ├── scaling_governor
│   │   ├── uname_-a
│   │   ├── uptime
│   │   └── version
│   └── profile
└── test-results
    └── tests
        │   ├── data
        │   ├── debug.log
        │   └── sysinfo
        │       ├── post
        │       └── pre
        │   ├── data
        │   ├── debug.log
        │   └── sysinfo
        │       ├── post
        │       └── pre
            ├── data
            ├── debug.log
            └── sysinfo
                ├── post
                └── pre

22 directories, 65 files

From what you can see, the results dir has:

  1. A human readable id in the top level, with the job SHA1.
  2. A human readable job.log in the top level, with human readable logs of the task
  3. Subdirectory jobdata, that contains machine readable data about the job.
  4. A machine readable results.xml and results.json in the top level, with a summary of the job information in xUnit/json format.
  5. A top level sysinfo dir, with sub directories pre, post and profile, that store sysinfo files pre/post/during job, respectively.
  6. Subdirectory test-results, that contains a number of subdirectories (filesystem-friendly test ids). Those test ids represent instances of test execution results.

Test execution instances specification

The instances should have:

  1. A top level human readable job.log, with job debug information
  2. A sysinfo subdir, with sub directories pre and post, that store sysinfo files pre test and post test, respectively.
  3. A data subdir, where the test can output a number of files if necessary.
[1]Avocado plugins can introduce additional test types.

Pre and post tests plugins

Avocado supports plug-ins which are (guaranteed to be) executed before the first test and after all tests finished. The interfaces are avocado.core.plugin_interfaces.JobPre, resp. avocado.core.plugin_interfaces.JobPost.

Note the pre_tests might not be executed due to earlier failure which prevents the tests from being executed.

The same applies for post_tests, but it is possible to have post_tests executed even when pre_tests were not. Additionally the post_tests are (obviously) not executed on SIGKILL. On the other hand they are executed on SIGTERM and KeyboardInterrupt while running the tests, but once the post_tests are executed the KeyboardInterrupt or SystemExit interrupts their processing (to avoid hangs) and remaining plug-ins will NOT be executed.

Jobscripts plugin

Avocado ships with a plugin (installed by default) that allows running scripts before and after the actual execution of Jobs. A user can be sure that, when a given “pre” script is run, no test in that job has been run, and when the “post” scripts are run, all the tests in a given job have already finished running.


By default, the script directory location is:


Inside that directory, that is a directory for pre-job scripts:


And for post-job scripts:


All the configuration about the Pre/Post Job Scripts are placed under the avocado.plugins.jobscripts config section. To change the location for the pre-job scripts, your configuration should look something like this:

pre = /my/custom/directory/for/pre/job/scripts/

Accordingly, to change the location for the post-job scripts, your configuration should look something like this:

post = /my/custom/directory/for/post/scripts/

A couple of other configuration options are available under the same section:

  • warn_non_existing_dir: gives warnings if the configured (or default) directory set for either pre or post scripts do not exist
  • warn_non_zero_status: gives warnings if a given script (either pre or post) exits with non-zero status

Script Execution Environment

All scripts are run in separate process with some environment variables set. These can be used in your scripts in any way you wish:

  • AVOCADO_JOB_UNIQUE_ID: the unique job-id.
  • AVOCADO_JOB_STATUS: the current status of the job.
  • AVOCADO_JOB_LOGDIR: the filesystem location that holds the logs and various other files for a given job run.

Note: Even though these variables should all be set, it’s a good practice for scripts to check if they’re set before using their values. This may prevent unintended actions such as writing to the current working directory instead of to the AVOCADO_JOB_LOGDIR if this is not set.

Finally, any failures in the Pre/Post scripts will not alter the status of the corresponding jobs.

Job Cleanup

It’s possible to register a callback function that will be called when all the tests have finished running. This effectively allows for a test job to clean some state it may have left behind.

At the moment, this feature is not intended to be used by test writers, but it’s seen as a feature for Avocado extensions to make use.

To register a callback function, your code should put a message in a very specific format in the “runner queue”. The Avocado test runner code will understand that this message contains a (serialized) function that will be called once all tests finish running.


from avocado import Test

def my_cleanup(path_to_file):
   if os.path.exists(path_to_file):

class MyCustomTest(Test):
   cleanup_file = '/tmp/my-custom-state'
   self.runner_queue.put({"func_at_exit": self.my_cleanup,
                          "args": (cleanup_file),
                          "once": True})

This results in the my_cleanup function being called with positional argument cleanup_file.

Because once was set to True, only one unique combination of function, positional arguments and keyword arguments will be registered, not matter how many times they’re attempted to be registered. For more information check avocado.utils.data_structures.CallbackRegister.register().